In our discussion this past week we came up with many 'definitions' of learning. I don't think anyone had any wrong ideas or anything,but I still think we have yet to hit the bullseye. All in all, I am still thinking that learning is an individual process that requires understanding and being to put the information into practice. However, the biologist in me won't let me not put that real learning should CHANGE you. You should ADAPT or EVOLVE in the process. Without this it would seem that much learning is temporary.
The second point in learning that we discussed would be how learning and transfer are related. Many see transfer as a 'aha' moment, but which one really comes first learning or transfer?? Like I stated in class its kind of like which came first the chicken or the egg. You can't have one without the other.
Monday, January 23, 2012
Teaching Reflections
I read Steve, Brea, and Morgan's teaching philosophies.
I personally got alot out of Steve's teaching philosophy. This is because it seemed to be written in a third person point of view. Like he was actually asking himself each one of these questions. I found it to be a refreshing idea. Being able to ask yourself questions like these and also being prepared to answer them on the spot shows preparation and passion for what you are doing. I also like how he used a metaphor for teaching/learning. Being able to visualize this makes the task of teaching a little more focused on that end result.
Both Brea and Morgan focused on having a safe/comfortable learning environment. While Morgan concentrated on being able to adapt herself to her students, Brea zoomed in on making sure that she was making the classroom as comfortable as possible by setting standards for herself and her students.
These reflections have given me some questions to ask myself, such as: Why do I teach? How can I make the process of teaching/learning comfortable for everyone? How can I make myself easily adapt and not fall into a pattern?
I personally got alot out of Steve's teaching philosophy. This is because it seemed to be written in a third person point of view. Like he was actually asking himself each one of these questions. I found it to be a refreshing idea. Being able to ask yourself questions like these and also being prepared to answer them on the spot shows preparation and passion for what you are doing. I also like how he used a metaphor for teaching/learning. Being able to visualize this makes the task of teaching a little more focused on that end result.
Both Brea and Morgan focused on having a safe/comfortable learning environment. While Morgan concentrated on being able to adapt herself to her students, Brea zoomed in on making sure that she was making the classroom as comfortable as possible by setting standards for herself and her students.
These reflections have given me some questions to ask myself, such as: Why do I teach? How can I make the process of teaching/learning comfortable for everyone? How can I make myself easily adapt and not fall into a pattern?
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Learning Defined
I do not think that learning can be easily defined; it all depends on what
situation (perspective) you are in at the time. As I am straddling a couple
different life situations: being a student, being a teacher, being an employee,
and many others; each will come with its own definition. In the most general
terms learning can be defined as gaining knowledge or skill based on
experience.
As I stated previously, learning has many definitions. From a student's perspective learning is gathering information you did not know before. Next is from a teaching standpoint where learning is defined as using information, either previously known or new, and putting it into practice to increase your overall understanding. Finally, the definition of learning form an employee’s point of view could be being shown by another individual how to complete specific tasks and why each task is done. So which one is true learning? That’s the definition that I think puzzles us all. Overall, I believe the previous definitions reveal how most people go through the motions without actually taking much from many of their experiences. True learning should change something about you, from your stance on a specific issue, to how you look/ react to what is going on around you.
As I stated previously, learning has many definitions. From a student's perspective learning is gathering information you did not know before. Next is from a teaching standpoint where learning is defined as using information, either previously known or new, and putting it into practice to increase your overall understanding. Finally, the definition of learning form an employee’s point of view could be being shown by another individual how to complete specific tasks and why each task is done. So which one is true learning? That’s the definition that I think puzzles us all. Overall, I believe the previous definitions reveal how most people go through the motions without actually taking much from many of their experiences. True learning should change something about you, from your stance on a specific issue, to how you look/ react to what is going on around you.
Monday, January 16, 2012
Teaching Philosophy #1
Teaching
Philosophy
As I am relatively new to the teaching end of the learning
world I anticipate that I will be entertaining many suggestions/ideas that may
be incorporated into my own teaching style. I am a compassionate person and
this will be shown in the way that I teach and interact with my students. I am
also a very analytical person, meaning I like to question why things are the
way they are and I hope that my students can develop some of that questioning
personality by asking questions that I might not even have an answer for. This
way the circle will complete itself, as learning and teaching go hand in hand,
having the teacher learn a little from their students.
Here are a couple of points that I think gives you the big
picture:
1.
Be prepared
·
Have all materials ready and give students
plenty of time to go over them.
·
Use outside sources to draw students into what
may have to be a lecture.
2.
Promote student success
·
Set goals for the students and for yourself.
·
Encourage the easy and the tough questions.
·
Get to know students on a more personal basis by
having an open door policy.
·
Have students get to know each other so they can
help each other when you are not available.
3.
Make the experience memorable
·
Use humor, games, common interest, real world examples,
or just something the engage student’s interest and make it fun.
·
Make what can be interactive interactive.
·
Have the students become the teacher, whether it
is presenting something to the whole class or by having in-class study groups.
4.
Admit when you do not know
·
Show students that you are only human too; this
will demonstrate to them that the goals you have set for them are attainable.
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Reading Reflection for 1/12/12
I am usually one of the first people to walk into a classroom on the first day of class. This allows to to 'people watch' as everyone enters and scans the room, chooses a place to sit, and get ready for class to begin. My practice of doing this for most of my classes made it easy for me to visualize Markwell and Courtney's observations and the stereotypes that are associated with this first observation. These same observational stereotyping crossed-over to the other reading, which included those that are racial, cultural, or sexist. So, the first take-home message is to not let appearance or first impressions determine the understanding that your student may have or their interest. I also appreciated that the Science Teaching Reconsidered chapter included several suggestions for getting to know your students, including tips to learn their names and how to make sure that you are using inclusive language.
The second issue that I found interesting was how Markwell and Courtney point out how teaching styles should change as the student is undergoing constant cognitive development. Many teachers, lecturers, professors, etc. use many of the same techniques, no matter what level the course may be. Most students are content with this, as the course would mainly consist of a lecture that was taught in black and white, true or false, point of view. So the typical memorize, take the test, and dump previous information would continue.
Overall, these two issues can be resolved the same way. If I would really get to know my students, I would find out why they are taking the course, where they are in cognitive development, and how to make them get the most out of it.
The second issue that I found interesting was how Markwell and Courtney point out how teaching styles should change as the student is undergoing constant cognitive development. Many teachers, lecturers, professors, etc. use many of the same techniques, no matter what level the course may be. Most students are content with this, as the course would mainly consist of a lecture that was taught in black and white, true or false, point of view. So the typical memorize, take the test, and dump previous information would continue.
Overall, these two issues can be resolved the same way. If I would really get to know my students, I would find out why they are taking the course, where they are in cognitive development, and how to make them get the most out of it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)